Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System Implementation in Flood Prone Barangays in Sta. Barbara, Pangasinan

AUTHOR(S)

DAFFNEYDEL U. VIDAL JOVER A. GAMATA, JD, PhD

ABSTRACT

—— This study assessed the implementation of the Disaster Risk Reduction Management in the Municipality of Santa Barbara, Pangasinan. Findings of the study revealed that the respondents rated the 5Ps of Disaster Risk Reduction Management System as “Evident|. These are philosophy, policies, programs, practices, and processes. The level of implementation of the DRRM in Santa Barbara was perceived by the respondents as “Implemented” in terms of disaster prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response, and rehabilitation and recovery. There is no significant relationship between Philosophy and Policies and the four (4) components of DRRM. There is a significant relationship between “Programs” and “Disaster Prevention and Mitigation”; while no significant relationship between “Programs” and “Disaster Preparedness,” “Response”, and “Rehabilitation and Recovery; There is a significant relationship between “Practices” and “Disaster Preparedness”, while no significant relationship between “Disaster Response,” “Rehabilitation and Recovery;” and there is a significant relationship between “Processes” and “Disaster Prevention and Mitigation,” “Preparedness,” and “Response,” while no significant relationship exist between “Processes” and “Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery.” The three (3) top most challenges encountered by LGU in the implementation of DRRM of Santa Barbara are the following: 1) Blocked/Non-existent drainage system and poorly planned road widening; 2) Funding and resource constraints, and 3) lack of capacity and training for barangay officials and volunteers. On the other hand, the stakeholders also encountered the following challenges:1) minimal budget for DRRM projects, equipment, relief goods, and livelihood programs; 2) Insufficient or irrelevant trainings/seminars for personnel needing capability building; and 3) Shortage of essential gear for debris clearing, transport, and early warning systems. As to the level of community participation in the implementation of DRRM, the respondents were involved/or participated in the development of DRRN plans and ensure that their needs and perspectives are considered. Based from the findings of this study, the following recommendations are hereby forwarded: LGU Santa Barbara may: 1) Include DRRM as one of its standing agenda, ensuring continuous focus on risk management. Discussions should involve around recent disaster events and lessons learned from previous disasters; 2) Conducts annual risks assessments Integrate lessons from post-disaster evaluations; 3) Procure and distributes essential equipment and resources to emergency response teams and volunteer units; 4) Disseminates warnings through various channels, including social media, local radio, mobile-based alerts, and community leaders to reach everyone; 5) Collaborates with DSWD to implement and strengthen Mental Health and Psychosocial support services in disaster response; 6) Builds the capacity of barangay officials and volunteers by equipping them with essential skills such as standard first aid and basic life support; 7) Strengthens barangay participation in DRRM through continuous coordination and communication with BDRRMCs; and 8) Facilitates access to financial aid programs, which provides direct cash to affected individuals. Keywords — disaster risk reduction. implementation, prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response, rehabilitation, and recovery